Although several approaches to leadership could be called
contingency theories, the most widely recognized is Fiedler’s (1964, 1967;
Fiedler & Garcia, 1987). Contingency theory is a leader–match theory
(Fiedler & Chemers, 1974), which means it tries to match leaders to
appropriate situations. It is called contingency because it suggests that a
leader’s effectiveness depends on how well the leader’s style fits the context.
To understand the performance of leaders, it is essential to understand the
situations in which they lead. Effective leadership is contingent on matching a
leader’s style to the right setting.
Fiedler developed contingency theory by studying the styles
of many different leaders who worked in different contexts, primarily military
organizations. He assessed leaders’ styles, the situations in which they
worked, and whether they were effective. After analyzing the styles of hundreds
of leaders who were both good and bad, Fiedler and his colleagues were able to
make empirically grounded generalizations about which styles of leadership were
best and which styles were worst for a given organizational context.
In short, contingency theory is concerned with styles and
situations. It provides the framework for effectively matching the leader and
the situation.
0 komentar:
Posting Komentar